Southern Appalachian Digital Collections

Western Carolina University (20) View all

Guyot and the Great Smokies

items 5 of 27 items
  • wcu_great_smoky_mtns-10285.jpg
Item
?

Item’s are ‘child’ level descriptions to ‘parent’ objects, (e.g. one page of a whole book).

  • This letter to the Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1863 is the guyot manuscript which has obtained, of late some considerable publicity. My interest in Guyot's explorations in the Smokies was aroused by the chapter, entitled "Guyot's Bets" in the "Lure of the Great Smokies*. This chapter contains an extensive list of peaks (reprinted with some errors from a secondary source), named by Guyot, which could not then be oorrelaeted with the present i day nomenclature. The number of unidenified peaks intrigued my Interest and led me to search for other articles by Guyot, which might solve the riddle. At the Library of Congress, by a fortunate chance, I discovered that as Professor Jones of Union College had written for a French University a treatise on Guyot. In compiling a Guyot Bibliography Professor Jones had learned of a manuscript written by Guyot, in the Library of the Coast and Geodetic Survey. The manuscript itself has been of much value to students of y Smoky History but of far greater value is the copy of the map accompaning the manuscript. Many of the Guyot names have not survived; some have proved to be very transitory but to all of us the matter has at least an historical interest. The value of the map in fixing the present day location of the Guyot names lies in the fact that the graphic location and accompanying elevations, coupled with Requisite familiarity with the regeion, has solved ths riddle of "Guyot's Pete". One notices many curious things on the map. The Mt. Sterling of to-day was then Mt. Starling. It will also be noticed that the map, which was apparently the work of one of Guyots .asaistants, contains some names which do not appear in the list of elevations. The map has also settled many controverted points, for instance, it shows an early use of Mt. Collins, west of Indian Gap and contrary to local opinions the original Mt. Guyot was never on the -5-
Object
?

Object’s are ‘parent’ level descriptions to ‘children’ items, (e.g. a book with pages).